Best Airtable Interfaces Alternatives (2026)
TL;DR
Airtable Interfaces is built into Airtable for creating custom views, included with per-seat Airtable pricing. Shareables creates embeddable widgets from 10+ sources starting at $6/mo. Choose Interfaces for internal Airtable dashboards; choose Shareables for public-facing embeddable widgets.
Why people look for Airtable Interfaces alternatives
- 1Per-seat pricing makes it expensive for larger teams
- 2Limited design customization
- 3Cannot embed on external websites easily
- 4Locked into Airtable ecosystem
- 5Need embeddable widgets on your website
What to look for in a Airtable Interfaces alternative
Data source support: Does it connect to your tools?
Widget variety: Can it display your data the way you need?
Embeddability: Can you add it to your existing website?
Pricing: Does it fit your budget?
Ease of use: How fast can you go from data to live widget?
Customization: Can you match your brand?
Best Airtable Interfaces alternatives
1. Shareables
No-code platform that turns Google Sheets, Airtable, Notion, and 10+ other data sources into embeddable website widgets and standalone sites. Set up in under 5 minutes with no coding required.
Starting at $6/mo · Free tier available
2. Softr
Building web apps and portals from Airtable
Best for: Teams building client portals with user logins. Internal tools that need write-back to Airtable
3. SpreadSimple
Building simple websites from Google Sheets
Best for: Small businesses selling products directly from Google Sheets. Teams wanting a simple product catalog with Stripe checkout
4. SpreadsheetWeb
Converting complex Excel spreadsheets into web apps
Best for: Enterprises with complex Excel calculators they need on the web. Insurance quoting tools, pricing calculators, financial models
5. Zite
Building simple websites powered by Airtable
Best for: Airtable users who want a very simple website from their base. Quick prototypes and landing pages from Airtable data
6. Fillout
Form building with database integrations
Best for: Teams that primarily need forms connected to databases. Collecting data from users and writing to Airtable/Notion
7. Pory
Building web apps and directories from Airtable
Best for: Building directories, marketplaces, or listing sites from Airtable. Resource libraries with search and filtering
Shareables vs Airtable Interfaces at a glance
| Functionalities | ||
|---|---|---|
| Airtable integration | Native to Airtable vs external connection | Native to Airtable vs external connection |
| Widget variety | Limited layout options vs 20+ templates | Limited layout options vs 20+ templates |
| Data source support | Airtable only vs 10+ | Airtable only vs 10+ |
| Embeddability | Embeds natively | Interfaces are link-shareable |
| Pricing value | Per-seat pricing adds up fast | Per-seat pricing adds up fast |
Pricing comparison
| Shareables | Airtable Interfaces | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes (1 widget, 1,000 records) | Yes (1 interface per base on free plan) |
| Starting price | $6/mo | $20/seat/mo |
| Business tier | $12/mo (Pro) | $45/seat/mo |
| Top tier | $40/mo (Ultimate, unlimited widgets) | Custom |
| Pricing model | per-widget | per-seat (included with Airtable) |
Who should choose what?
Choose Airtable Interfaces if you need...
- Teams already paying for Airtable who need internal dashboards
- Quick internal data views within the Airtable ecosystem
Choose Shareables if you need...
- Teams that want to display spreadsheet/database data on their website
- No-code builders who need embeddable widgets
- Small businesses wanting a quick, affordable data-driven site
- Agencies managing multiple client widgets
- Anyone using Airtable, Google Sheets, or Notion as a CMS
Frequently Asked Questions
Airtable Interfaces can be shared via link or basic iframe, but they are designed for internal use. Shareables provides native embed codes designed for public-facing websites.
Usually yes. Shareables charges per widget ($6/mo for 3 widgets). Airtable charges per seat ($20+/seat/mo). For display-only needs, Shareables is more cost-effective.