At a glance
| Functionalities | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Stacker has more complexity for its app-building focus | Stacker has more complexity for its app-building focus |
| Widget variety | 20+ embeddable templates | App layouts |
| Data source support | 10+ | Airtable, Sheets, and Salesforce |
| User authentication | Stacker has full user auth and permissions | Stacker has full user auth and permissions |
| Embeddability | Embeds anywhere | Standalone apps |
| Pricing value | $59/mo vs $6/mo | $59/mo vs $6/mo |
Detailed comparison
Target Use
Stacker builds internal business applications: CRMs, client portals, project trackers. It is designed for logged-in users with permissions.
Shareables builds public-facing data widgets and sites. Anyone can view the content without logging in.
Bottom line: Different products for different needs. Stacker = internal tools. Shareables = public display.
Pricing
Stacker starts at $59/mo. Business plan is $149/mo. Enterprise is $399/mo.
Shareables starts at $6/mo. Ultimate plan with unlimited widgets is $40/mo.
Bottom line: Shareables costs a fraction of Stacker for public-facing data display.
Pricing
| Shareables | Stacker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes (1 widget, 1,000 records) | Yes (5 users, limited features) |
| Starting price | $6/mo | $59/mo |
| Business tier | $12/mo (Pro) | $149/mo |
| Top tier | $40/mo (Ultimate, unlimited widgets) | $399/mo |
| Pricing model | per-widget | per-app |
Strengths and weaknesses
Stacker
Strengths
- + Full user authentication and role-based permissions
- + CRM and client portal functionality
- + Write-back to data sources
- + Salesforce integration
Weaknesses
- - Expensive starting at $59/mo
- - Not designed for embedding or public-facing widgets
- - Setup takes significant time compared to widget tools
- - Overkill for simple data display
Shareables
Strengths
- + Supports 10+ data sources (Airtable, Google Sheets, Notion, Excel, Trello, and more)
- + Embeddable widgets that work on any website or page builder
- + 20+ widget templates (blog, products, events, FAQ, testimonials, charts, and more)
- + Quick setup, under 5 minutes from data to live widget
Weaknesses
- - No user authentication or login portals
- - No form submissions or data write-back
- - Newer platform, smaller community compared to established players
- - Limited to displaying and presenting data (read-only)
Who should choose what?
Choose Stacker if you need...
- Teams building internal tools and CRMs
- Client portals with user logins and permissions
- Businesses needing Salesforce-connected portals
Choose Shareables if you need...
- Teams that want to display spreadsheet/database data on their website
- No-code builders who need embeddable widgets
- Small businesses wanting a quick, affordable data-driven site
- Agencies managing multiple client widgets
- Anyone using Airtable, Google Sheets, or Notion as a CMS
What customers say
“This is a game-changer for our agency in terms of enhancing our clients' experience without complicating our backend support, as the clients can simply update spreadsheet information in real time. Once it's set up and optimized, it's pretty much plug and play. If you want dynamic content displayed in a very digestible, beautifully presented format, Shareables will be a great tool for you. Ryan also provides very fast support to solve all my questions.”
Byron
Aranka Media
“For product showcases and micro-directories, Shareables feels like a perfect starter replacement for Softr, Glide, and CommonNinja — especially when embeds and flexibility matter. Setup was fast. I connected my data, picked a layout, and published in minutes. Embeds worked exactly how I needed. Audio players, videos, and custom elements felt native inside the listings, not bolted on. Simple tool. Fast results. Exactly what I needed.”
Prashant
Mahakatha
“Shareables is exactly what I was looking for to quickly build and share curated directories. The interface is incredibly clean, and the setup process is fast and intuitive. I looked into heavier directory tools like Brilliant Directories and also considered building custom frontends connected to Airtable. Those solutions felt too bulky, expensive, and time-consuming. Shareables strikes the perfect balance between simplicity and functionality.”
Noah Reed
Frequently Asked Questions
Use Stacker if you need internal tools with user logins and permissions. Use Shareables if you need public-facing embeddable widgets on your website.
For public data display, yes. For internal apps with user authentication, no. They serve different purposes.